Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

Outstanding breakdown of Life360's unit economics and valuation metrics. Your comparison of the $2,400 per subscriber valuation to Netflix ($1,600) and Spotify ($470) is particularly illuminating - it really crystallizes how much growth expectation is baked into the current price. The key insight here is that investors are betting Life360 can sustain 30-40% revenue growth while expanding margins, versus the mature ~10% growth of Netflix/Spotify. The ARPU journey from $59 in 2018 to $152 in 2024 is impressive - nearly 3x in six years. But I wonder about the sustainability of that ARPU growth trajectory. Most of the recent gains came from major price hikes (the 24% YoY jump in Q4 2023 you mentioned) and tier migrations. How much pricing power remains before hitting churn thresholds? Your point about 85% gross margins on subscriptions is critical - that's stellar unit economics if they can scale. The 2024 achievement of first full-year positive EBITDA ($45.5M) validates the business model. However, the path to management's ambitious $1B revenue target (from $371M currently) requires sustaining the ~25% subscriber growth plus continued ARPU expansion. The comparison to the $70 per MAU when including all 80M+ users is intersting - it highlights the monetization opportunity if they can convert more free users or generate meaningful ad revenue (their >$1 per MAU ad target). The advertising avenue could be transformative, but also risks alienating users if done poorly. Overall, the valuation seems to assume near-perfect execution on all fronts: subscriber growth, ARPU, ad monetization, and margin expansion. Any hiccup in these growth drivers would likely lead to significant multiple compression. Great analysis though!

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?